Brian Holland
Dec 1, 2016
Airport security screening. If you ask most people what
their point of view is on airport security screening, you will find that the
majority of individuals consider it a necessary evil. A recent Gallup poll actually found that most
Americans are okay sacrificing privacy for security, while another Gallup poll
on airport security found that Americans’ views of the TSA are more positive
than negative.
In the cat-and-mouse game between security professionals and
terrorists, the stakes could not be higher. The rise of discontented extremist
groups around the world has increased since September 11th and so has the
frequency of attack. “As threat levels increase, components get smaller and
capabilities of our attackers improve.
The need for advanced technologies and training in the security industry
is a never ending cycle.,” says Brian Holland, president of Point Security
Inc., a vendor of security screening equipment.
Individuals try to sneak products or destructive components
onto planes and security personnel try to catch them in the act. However,
security personnel like the TSA and other regulating bodies around the world do
not have the adequate resources to fully scan every passenger and every piece
of luggage coming through an airport.
Holland goes on to say that the “Quality of the detection
process and the time needed to process, have always been opposing forces. The
difference between three minutes and ten seconds of scan time per process, can
equate to hours of lost time when multiplied by the millions that travel each
year.” Security professionals are tasked with a difficult choice of where to
cut costs. Should one invest in a new, cutting-edge screening equipment or
bring in more staff? Will the busy holiday travel season (typically between
late November and early January) require more baggage scanners or body
scanners? Furthermore, how long can we keep the average passenger in the
security checkpoints?
In December 2015, Americans saw terrorism as the number one
problem facing the nation. Terrorism was seen as more important than guns,
government, and the economy. With tensions high, security manufacturing
personnel need to have a global approach to solving the problem. Countries -
and airports within countries - have different budgets, and accordingly,
different needs. While it may make sense for JFK to invest in the newest
baggage screening tool that decreases wait times, it may make more economic
sense for an airport in Burkina Faso to train temporary staff members to meet
the holiday rush.
Transparency of information is also a key component.
Countries should work together to thwart recent developments in smuggling, and
terrorism plots. If one airport learns of a recent development that breached
security, other airports around the world should be kept up to speed.
Meet the Author
Brian Holland is the President of Point Security Inc., a certified small business with over twenty-five years of experience
providing sales and service of security screening equipment throughout the
United States and the Caribbean. He enjoys educating individuals in ways that
can better secure their facility. For more information please contact Point
Security Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment